Executive Summaries Nov 21, 2023

The Data Processing Agreement: An Essential Resource to Implement

The enactment of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe has changed the global legislative landscape for the protection of personal information (PI), particularly since it incorporates the concepts of “controller,” the person responsible for the PI, and “processor,” the person who processes PI for, on behalf of, and in accordance with the instructions of the controller. The GDPR stipulates that the disclosure of personal information by a controller to a processor must meet multiple strict requirements, including executing a contract for the processing of personal information that is commonly known as a Data Processing Agreement (DPA).

Background

Since September 22, 2023, businesses in Québec have been required to adhere to new regulations regarding the protection of PI, with stricter oversight applied to certain exceptions. One of these is the exception to obtaining the consent of data subjects for the disclosure of their PI if this information is required for the purposes of a mandate or the performance of a contract of enterprise of for services. It is now required that a DPA, which includes the parameters determined by law, be established. Hence, Québec legislation stipulates the various requirements that Québec DPAs must include.

In practice, a DPA may be a separate contract or an appendix to a mandate, contract of enterprise or contract for services that requires PI to be processed. This is known as a Data Processing Addendum. For instance, the separate DPA might be used when a company has previously contracted with its payroll service provider or cloud data-hosting service, and the existing service contract does not fully cover the rules that apply to the protection of PI, while, an appendix would be used when entering into a new service agreement.

Requirements in Québec

The Act respecting the Protection of Personal Information in the Private Sector (ARPPIPS) requires that the mandate, contract of enterprise or contract for services be produced in writing and that it contains at least the following provisions:

  • 1. The measures that the processor must take to ensure the confidentiality and protection of PI;
  • 2. The PI must only be used for the fulfilment of the mandate, contract of enterprise or contract for services and may not be retained by the processor once the contract has expired or been rescinded;
  • 3. The processor must notify the person in charge of the protection of PI (PCPPI) following any breach or attempted breach of confidentiality of the PI disclosed to the processor; and
  • 4. The PCPPI must be able to carry out the necessary verification on the processor to ensure that it complies with the provisions of the DPA and protects the confidentiality of the PI.

It should be noted, however, that such a DPA is not required when the agent or party performing the contract of enterprise of for services is a public body or a member of a professional order. As an example, a DPA would not be required when you disclose PI directly to your lawyer or doctor so that he or she can provide professional services. Nor would it be required when you provide the Commission d’accès à l’information, a public body, with your contact details when you wish to lodge an application for a review of a right-of-access request to your PI.

Please note that a DPA is required for transferring PI outside Québec. In fact, prior to an out-of-province transfer of PI, companies – as required by the ARPPIPS – must carry out a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) that takes into account the security measures that have been implemented as required by the controller under the DPA. A DPA that provides an adequate framework for the rights and obligations of the processor will favour a PIA that is favourable to an out-of-province transfer.

Best Practices

While Québec law requires only the aforementioned items, best practices, inspired by the GDPR, call for improving DPA content so as to clearly outline each party’s roles and responsibilities.

Here are other provisions you may wish to add to your DPAs:

  • Compliance with the law: each party should be accountable to the other for breaches of privacy laws.
  • Access to PI: the DPA may specify which persons may have access to the PI and whether they must have received training regarding the confidentiality and protection of PI.
  • Sub-processors: may the processor delegate the processing of PI to sub-processors, and if so, what would be the procedure for doing it?
  • Right of the persons concerned: you may include the procedure that the processor must follow when persons concerned get in touch and express their wish to exercise one of their rights, such as their right of access or rectification.
  • Processing sites and transfers outside Québec: detail the procedure that applies if the processor intending to transfer PI beyond Quebec’s borders and identify where the PI will be processed.

To Conclude

It is important to remember that DPAs are required as a means of benefiting from the exception to the rule: they allow PI to be disclosed without obtaining the consent of the persons concerned and only if the PI is necessary for the performance of a mandate or contract of enterprise of for services.

In order to do so, a written DPA must be in place between the controller (the customer: the person who has control over and responsibility for the PI) and the processor (the service provider: the person who will be processing the PI) as well as between the processor and its own processors (the subprocessors). At a minimum, the DPA must contain clauses indicating:

  • The measures that the processor must take to protect the confidentiality of PI;
  • PI is used only to fulfil the mandate or the contract of enterprise or for services; and
  • That the processor notifies the controller in the event of a confidentiality incident or attempted incident and allows the controller to carry out audits.

While only the above are required under the ARPPIPS, it should be noted that a comprehensive DPA must take into account several other aspects and is unique to each business.

If you have any questions about DPAs or the protection of privacy and personal information, please feel free to contact our Privacy and Data Protection professionals, who will be happy to advise you.

Stay on the lookout!

Subscribe to our communications and benefit from our market knowledge to identify new business opportunities, learn about innovative best practices and receive the latest developments. Discover our exclusive thought leadership and events.

Subscribe

You would also like

Data-Privacy

Bill 82: One Step Closer to a National Digital Identity (and Modifications to Other Provisions!)

Entrepreneurship forum

Entrepreneurship Forum: Vision 2025

Athlete

Protecting Privacy in Sports – Don’t Wait to be Caught Flat-Footed!

data-protection

Obligation to Report Information Security Incidents: The Autorité des Marchés Financiers Catches the Wave and Publishes a New Regulation

Right to Data Portability: Is your Organization Ready?

Tech Forum 360

Tech 360 Forum: Growth and Inflection Points

Prospera: Québec’s Economic Barometer

Canada's Best Managed Companies: BCF Recognized for 17th Consecutive Year

paul et misha

BCF Strengthens its Expertise in Artificial Intelligence

new-partners-2024

BCF Has Appointed Three New Partners

Who’s Who Legal : 5 BCF Professionals Stand Out

BCF extends its Partnership with the Canadian Association of Black Lawyers to a Third Year

Demystifying Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs)

camera-on-a-wall

The Incident Response Plan: the Cornerstone of Effective Crisis Management

forum-privacy-en

Strategic Forum on Enterprise Data Protection

Chambers Canada Ranking: Five of our Lawyers Recognized

Photo of Julie Doré

Julie Doré Takes Over Management of The BCF Business Law Firm

Prospera – Quebec Economic Barometer

Julien Tricart, Member of the Meritas Sports Law Group

Pride Month: Let’s Create an Inclusive Future

Canada’s Best Managed Companies: BCF Recognized for 16th Consecutive Year

New Privacy Requirements: Is Your Business Compliant?

Every Woman Counts

Strategic Forum on the Role Played by Businesses in the Fight Against Climate Change

BCF Partners with the Canadian Association of Black Lawyers to Promote Diversity in Québec Law Faculties

BCF's More Inclusive Approach: Improved Parental Leave

Shaun E. Finn Appointed to the Superior Court of Québec

How to Ensure a Business Succession?

Business black folders on table

Adoption of Bill 78 on Transparency Business: Are You Ready?

Strategic Forum on Market Consolidation and Business Succession

BCF Partners with the Clinique Juridique de Saint-Michel to Promote Access to Legal Studies for Young People from Diverse Communities

What Are the Best Practices for Managing Privacy Incidents?

Shaun E. Finn, Co-Author of In the Public Eye: Privacy, Personal Information, and High Stakes Litigation in the Canadian Public Sector

Should Using Personal Information Obtained Without Consent Be Grounds for Class Action Authorization?

Five of our Lawyers Stand out in the 2023 Edition of the Chambers Canada Ranking

Cybersecurity and Privacy in Canada: What You Need to Know About Bill C-27

Is the Loss of Personal Information Sufficient to Justify the Success of a Class Action on the Merits?

Bill C-26: The Federal Government Takes a Closer Look at Cybersecurity and Privacy

Jocelyn Poirier, BCF’s Chief Privacy Officer

43 BCF Professionals Stand Out with 78 Nominations in the 2023 Editions of Best Lawyers in Canada and Ones to Watch

Seven New Lawyers Join BCF

Adoption of Bill 96: Be Ready

Pride Month: The Value of Diversity

BCF, the 3rd Largest Law Firm in Québec

Canada’s Best Managed Companies: BCF Recognized for 15th Consecutive Year

BCF Recognized by the Globe and Mail as one of Canada’s top Law Firms

Chambers Canada 2022: BCF Earned Band 1 Ranking in Québec for Corporate and Commercial Law

Seven New Lawyers Join BCF

Privacy and Data Protection Class Actions: Trends, Challenges and Best Practices

A First in Canada: Privacy Class Action Dismissed on the Merits

escalier

BCF Welcomes Seven New Lawyers

Collaboration in the Time of COVID-19: Legal Considerations for Successful AI and Healthcare Partnerships

Shaun E. Finn and Danielle Miller Olofsson Publish a Unique Practical Handbook on Privacy and Data-Protection Class Actions

What Are the Implications of the End of EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework for Your Business?

Investigation on Tim Hortons’ Application

Québec’s Bill 64 to Amend Data Protection Legislation: A Bill with Teeth?

Does the Use of Thermal Imaging Cameras in Stores Comply with Privacy Laws?

COVID-19: Solutions to Address this Situation

COVID-19: Finally a Toolbox for Developers of Geolocalisation Applications

Tracking the COVID-19 Pandemic with Cellphones

COVID-19: Don’t Forget Data Protection When Designing a Response Strategy

BCF once again ranks as one of Montreal's Top Employers

BCF Names 16 New Partners for Its 25th Anniversary

Joint Controllership or the Risks of using Website Plugins

Are You a Leader or a Follower?Results of the Innovation Survey

Chambers Canada 2020: BCF Recognised in Corporate and Commercial Law

Strategic Forum on Innovation

Different Legislative Approaches to 5G

Innovating to Survive: Are You a Leader or a Follower?

Is Your Company Implementing a New Technology System? Remember to Protect Your Data

5G Technology Is Coming: Legal Questions Abound

Legal Issues Surrounding the Industrial Revolution 4.0

Where Does Québec Stand in Terms of Privacy Class Actions?

De-fogging the Cloud Act

fenetres

Google and CNIL: a Case of Inappropriately Obtained Consent

Best Practices for Québec Companies Receiving European Data

Anonymization? Think Again

The Deep Web and Dark Web Demystified for Businesses

The GDPR is Coming: How to Get Ready

Protection of Personal Data: New Measures Put in Place by the European Union

Is Your Organisation Collecting Too Much Data and Is It Well Protected?

Get the latest thought leadership