Executive Summaries Sep 4, 2018

New Rights for Employees with Respect to Leave and Authorized Absences

Bill 176, An Act to amend the Act respecting labour standards and other legislative provisions mainly to facilitate family-work balance (the "Act"), which was adopted by the National Assemblye on June 12 2018, has introduced some major changes to the labour standards, in particular several amendments with respect to leaves and authorized absences.

SICK LEAVE

One of these amendments consists in the elimination of the requirement for the employee to have accumulated at least 3 months of uninterrupted service with the employer to benefit from a sick leave of up to 26 weeks over a 12 months period; hence the possibility that the employer might have to face recourse for prohibited practice in the event of the employee’s dismissal during their probation period, as set forth by the Act respecting labour standards.

Likewise, the Act entitles the employee to have the first 2 days of sick leave paid, it being specified, however, that this right is limited to one absence per year. Even so, this right is subject to the employee having accrued 3 months of continued service. Note that this right to 2 days' paid sick leave applies neither to senior managerial personnel nor to employees governed by the Act respecting labour relations, vocational training and workforce management in the construction industry.

ANNUAL LEAVE : A THIRD WEEK OF PAID VACATION AFTER 3 YEARS OF CONTINUED SERVICE

Another notable amendment: until the adoption of Bill 176, the employee needed to accrue 5 years of continued service before being able to claim a third week of paid vacation (for a complete year of work). This threshold has been lowered to 3 years.

AUTHORIZED ABSENCES TO FULFILL FAMILY OR PARENTAL DUTIES

The Act also modifies the employee’s rights with respect to absences to fulfill family or parental responsibilities. As of today, section 79.7, paragraph 1 of the Act respecting labour standards provides as follows: “An employee may be absent from work, without pay, for 10 days per year to fulfil obligations relating to the care, health or education of the employee’s child or the child of the employee’s spouse, or because of the state of health of the employee’s spouse, father, mother, brother, sister or one of the employee’s grandparents.”

The Act broadened the definition of “relative” to include relatives of the employee’s spouse as well as their spouses, children and children’s spouses, and provides that certain days of absence may also be taken for the benefit of persons, other than relatives, for whom an employee acts as a “caregiver” (as evidenced by a professional working in the health and social services sector and governed by the Code des professions).

The legislator also codified the principle developed by case law according to which the employer can request a document from the employee certifying the reasons for this absence, if the circumstances justify such request, notably in light of the duration of the employee’s absence.

In this context, it is also worth mentioning that the employee who has accrued 3 months of continued service with his employer is entitled to remuneration for the first 2 days of absence per year. Until now, the employee was not entitled to any remuneration for this absence. Again, it must be emphasized this right applies neither to senior managerial personnel nor to employees governed by the Act respecting labour relations, vocational training and workforce management in the construction industry.

Furthermore, the duration of an authorized absence because of a serious illness or accident (non life-threatening) of an employee’s relative (as redefined by the Act) was increased by the Act from 12 to 16 weeks over a period of 12 months. Another change: where the sick or injured relative is a minor child, the period of authorized absence is 36 weeks maximum over the same period of time.

Finally, in the event of a serious and potentially fatal illness, attested by a medical certificate, the employee may be absent from work for a maximum period of 27 weeks (and a maximum of 104 weeks if the person is a minor child, but this authorization already existed prior to the adoption of the Act).

The same rules apply where the employee must stay with a person for whom he/she acts as a caregiver.

ABSENCES DUE TO THE DISAPPEARANCE OF A CHILD, DEATH OR FUNERAL

In the event of the disappearance of the employee’s minor child, the employee is henceforth authorized to be absent from work, without pay, for up to 104 weeks (versus 52 before) (section 79.10 of the Act respecting labour standards).

The same duration applies in the event of death of the employee’s minor child (section 79.10.1 of the Act respecting labour standards), or following the death of the employee’s spouse, father, mother or child of full age, but only if it is due to suicide or the death occurs during, or results directly from, a criminal act (save where the deceased was a party to or contributed to the act through willful misconduct) (sections 79.11 to 79.13 of the Act respecting labour standards).

Finally, an employee may be absent from work for 2 days (versus 1 day before), with full pay, in the event of the death or funeral of his spouse, child or spouse’s child, his father, mother, brother or sister. The employee may take an additional unpaid leave of 3 days (versus 4 days before) on the same occasion.

ABSENCE FOR BIRTH, ADOPTION OR TERMINATION PREGNANCY

Pursuant to section 81.1 of the Act respecting labour standards, “an employee may be absent from work for five days at the birth of their child, the adoption of a child or where there is a termination of pregnancy in or after the twentieth week of pregnancy.

Until now, the first two days of absence were only paid if the employee had accrued 60 days of continued service. This minimum service requirement was eliminated by the Act.

COMING INTO FORCE OF THESE AMENDMENTS

While the majority of the changes mentioned in the present article only come into force on January 1, 2019, certain amendments specifically with regard to the increased duration of certain authorized absences, already apply.

BCF Business Law's labour and employment team is available to answer your questions.

You would also like

hands-signing-documents

Harassment and Workplace Violence: What Recent Case Law Teaches Us

Certificat medical

Medical Certificates: New Rules for Québec Employers

BCF Recognized in the 2025 Edition of Benchmark Litigation Canada

Mental Health

Mental Health in the Workplace: Obligations and Best Practices

handshake BCF x GRAVEL2

GRAVEL2 LABOUR LAW FIRM JOINS BCF BUSINESS LAW

Entrepreneurship forum

Entrepreneurship Forum: Vision 2025

Tech Forum 360

Tech 360 Forum: Growth and Inflection Points

PL 42

Update on Harassment Policy and New Training Requirements

EDI - équité diversité inclusion

Gender Identity: Prohibited Grounds of Discrimination in Hiring

Prospera: Québec’s Economic Barometer

Droit

Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act: Requirements and Obligations for Businesses

diversity-inclusion

Diversity and Inclusion: Recent Rulings Clarifying Employers Rights and Obligations

Canada's Best Managed Companies: BCF Recognized for 17th Consecutive Year

decision-labour-law

4 Game-Changing Employment Law Rulings in 2023

artificial-intelligence-into-the-workplace

Building Artificial Intelligence into the Workplace: Impacts, Challenges, and Québec’s Legal Framework

What Federal Employers Need to Know About Pay Equity

papier signe

Novolecs Acquires Assets of Stace in Québec

forum-travail

Strategic Forum on Labour and Employment

kitchen-blue-pots

Doyon Després Acquires First Branch Outside Québec

hands-signing-documents

Voting on Agreement in Principle: What Happens If Rejected?

chairs-in-a-classroom

FAE Agreement: What to Expect Legally?

cellphone-computer

Consumer Protection Act: Important Nuances that Merchants Need to Know

Employment Equity: Black Workers and 2SLGBTQ+ Workers Will Now Be Designated in Federal Legislation

signature-contrat

Non-Competition Clauses: Beware of Abusive Legal Proceedings!

livres-echelle

Work-related Injury Claims: Employers Must Update their Practices!

andre-ryan-client-choice

André Ryan Wins the Prestigious Client Choice Awards for 2023

Construction Work: An Additional Liability for Owner-Employers

Who’s Who Legal : 5 BCF Professionals Stand Out

BCF extends its Partnership with the Canadian Association of Black Lawyers to a Third Year

Bill C-58: New Obligations for Companies under Federal Jurisdiction

Annie-Claude Trudeau and Audrée Anne Barry, Co-Authors of the 2023-2024 Annotated Code of Civil Procedure

newspaper

Le Devoir is now a Registered Journalism Organization

Chambers Canada Ranking: Five of our Lawyers Recognized

Photo of Julie Doré

Julie Doré Takes Over Management of The BCF Business Law Firm

Three Up-and-Coming Lawyers Join BCF

Fingerprints on paper

Biometrics in the Workplace: Considerations and Challenges for Your Company

BCF Welcomes Five New Up-and-Coming Lawyers

Prospera – Quebec Economic Barometer

34 Professionals Stand Out in the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2023

Julien Tricart, Member of the Meritas Sports Law Group

Pride Month: Let’s Create an Inclusive Future

Canada’s Best Managed Companies: BCF Recognized for 16th Consecutive Year

The non-profit organization SOLIDES gets its hands on 363 doors in a major transaction to curb the housing crisis in Drummondville

Every Woman Counts

Bill No. 10: What Impact on Our Health Services?

“Performance Management in the Hybrid Work Era” with Nancy Boyle and Nathalie Gonthier

Strategic Forum on the Role Played by Businesses in the Fight Against Climate Change

BCF Partners with the Canadian Association of Black Lawyers to Promote Diversity in Québec Law Faculties

BCF's More Inclusive Approach: Improved Parental Leave

Shaun E. Finn Appointed to the Superior Court of Québec

How to Ensure a Business Succession?

Athos Commemorative Services Acquires Les Espaces Memoria Inc.

OPTEL Obtains Support from Fondaction and BDC Capital to Realize its Growth Projects

Strategic Forum on Market Consolidation and Business Succession

BCF Partners with the Clinique Juridique de Saint-Michel to Promote Access to Legal Studies for Young People from Diverse Communities

Gender Wage Gap: Where Are We Today?

What Are the Best Practices for Managing Privacy Incidents?

The Supreme Court Will Address the Issue of Unionization of First-Level Managers

10 Best Practices for International Recruitment

43 BCF Professionals Stand Out with 78 Nominations in the 2023 Editions of Best Lawyers in Canada and Ones to Watch

Why Did the Superior Court of Québec Stay Some Sections of Bill 96?

Sportscene Group Becomes Grandio Group and Expands its Brand Portfolio

Seven New Lawyers Join BCF

Adoption of Bill 96: Be Ready

Pride Month: The Value of Diversity

Adoption of Bill 96: What Employers Need to Know

BCF, the 3rd Largest Law Firm in Québec

Canada’s Best Managed Companies: BCF Recognized for 15th Consecutive Year

BCF Stands Out in Benchmark Litigation Canada's 2022 Edition

lexpert

22 Professionals Stand Out in the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2022

Workplace Harassment: The Employer's Obligation Explained

How to Effectively Plan a Successful Return to the Workplace

See What Others Don’t: Solutions to Labour Shortage

New Obligations Related to Domestic Violence: What Employers Need to Know

Vaccine Passport in Stores: What About Employers’ Management Rights?

BCF Welcomes Three New Partners

Employers Under Federal Jurisdiction: Are You Ready for the New Pay Equity Requirements?

Government Employees and Mandatory Vaccination

What to Do About Unvaccinated Employees?

Mandatory Vaccinations in the Workplace: Is it Legal?

New Statutory Federal Holiday: What Employers Need to Know

46 Lawyers of BCF Stand Out with 83 Recognitions in the 2022 Editions of Best Lawyers in Canada and Ones to Watch

A Victory for Students at ABI: How this Judgment May Affect Your Business

Employers, Are You Prepared to Get Your Team Back in the Office?

Our Partners Recognized in the 2021 Edition of Benchmark Litigation Canada Rankings

escalier

BCF Welcomes Seven New Lawyers

How Telecommuting Transforms The Application Of Non-Competition Clauses

What You Need to Know About COVID-19 Pandemic Curfews and Mitigation Measures in Quebec

NHL Salary Arbitration, an Update with André Lepage

Supreme Court Rules: Protection Against Cruel and Unusual Punishment Does Not Apply to Legal Persons

13 NHL Teams Move to Salary Arbitration Mode

Shaun E. Finn Co-author of the Annotated Code of Civil Procedure 2020-2021

23 BCF Partners Ranked in the Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory

36 Lawyers of BCF Stand Out with 52 Nominations in the 2021 Edition of Best Lawyers in Canada

How to Avoid Penal Liability in Your Post-COVID Activities

Are Quebec Teachers Allowed to Legally Refuse Work Because of the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Schools Reopening: Can Teachers Refuse Work?

COVID-19: Solutions to Address this Situation

75% Wage Subsidy: What, Who and How, and Several Questions

Tracking the COVID-19 Pandemic with Cellphones

COVID-19: Employers, Stay Calm, But Be Proactive!

50 Questions You Need to Ask Yourself Before Doing Business in Canada

BCF Names 16 New Partners for Its 25th Anniversary

Are You a Leader or a Follower?Results of the Innovation Survey

Chambers Canada 2020: BCF Recognised in Corporate and Commercial Law

Major Privacy Breakthrough in the Construction Industry

Important Labour Relations Judgment in the Construction Industry

Strategic Forum on Innovation

Humania Assurance Acquires All the Assets of Tour+Med

Best Lawyers in Canada: 22 BCF Lawyers Recognized

Shaun E. Finn Co-author of the Annotated Code of Civil Procedure 2018-2019

André Lepage Demystifies Salary Arbitration for NHL Players

16 BCF Partners Recognized in the Prestigious Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory

How Does a Lawyer Become a NHL Team’s Right-Hand Man?

Cannabis: Balancing Privacy Rights and Employer’s Management Prerogative

Provincial Elections: The Polls Are Opening

Random Drug Testing in the Workplace

The End of the So-Called ʺOrphanʺ Clauses Relating to Pension Plans and Other Employee Benefits

New Obligations for Personnel Placement Agencies and Employers Who Retain their Services

Student Summer Work: Does a Lower Salary Constitute Discrimination?

Marijuana Legalization: What to Expect for Employers?

Bill 176 Modifying the Labor Standards: Significant Impacts for Employers

Get the latest thought leadership