

Executive summary
Jun 9, 2026
min to read
Since the modernization of Québec's occupational health and safety regime, psychosocial risks (“PSR”) no longer fall solely under HR “best practices”: they are an integral part of the obligations set forth in the Act respecting occupational health and safety (“AOHS”).
Employers must now incorporate psychosocial risks into their prevention measures and be able to show that they have a comprehensive, documented approach tailored to their operational reality, just as they do for physical risks.
The AOHS doesn't define PSRs, but the Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ) links them to factors related to work organization, management practices, employment conditions, and social relations.
Depending on the setting, job functions, and circumstances, such factors may take the form of issues related to recognition, autonomy, support, communication, workload, or workplace relationships, although their existence, intensity, or effects cannot be assumed outright in any given organization.
The AOHS further specifies that PSRs also include risks related to sexual violence.
Depending on the context, such factors can affect psychological health, involvement and performance. If not properly addressed, their impact can quickly lead to tangible issues: absenteeism, turnover, tensions, incidents, complaints and, in some cases, claims related to psychological injuries.
Managing PSRs isn't just about prevention; it's also a way to manage risks.
A proactive approach often helps reduce absenteeism and replacement costs, limit turnover, improve the work environment, and prevent sensitive issues (complaints, investigations, disputes). When well structured, a PSR strategy becomes an organizational asset and helps strengthen the organization’s overall performance.
PSRs are strongly influenced by the context: types of activities, peak periods, schedules, customer interactions, autonomy, supervision, working alongside third parties, etc.
A credible approach relies on precisely identifying the risk factors specific to the organization, followed by realistic control measures that are monitored over time.
The new law does more than simply “recognize” psychosocial risks; it requires that they be addressed within the core prevention framework. Two elements are now central:
Depending on the company's size, an employer must implement a prevention program (20 or more employees) or an action plan (fewer than 20 employees).
While the format may vary, the goal remains the same: to eliminate PSR factors at the source whenever possible, or, otherwise, to manage them through a continuous process that is periodically updated (including during the annual review).
Specifically, this means prioritizing issues, implementing appropriate measures (work organization, supervision, communications, training, mechanisms for reporting and addressing relational issues), and verifying their effectiveness.
The HSR and the HSC (when required) strengthen the credibility of the process: they help identify early warning signs, structure discussions, and support continuous improvement.
As of October 1, 2025, an HSC must be implemented when a workplace has at least 20 workers for 21 days or more per year (and it must continue until December 31 of that year, even if the workforce falls below this threshold).
Practically speaking, a solid PSR strategy is built around a continuous cycle:
Failure to properly address psychosocial risks can lead to interventions and sanctions by the CNESST, as well as increasing the risk of investigations, complaints, and litigation (particularly regarding harassment or discrimination).
Beyond the human and operational impacts, a lack of a clear, documented PSR management approach that is integrated into prevention and participation measures weakens the employer’s position when a sensitive issue arises and reduces their ability to act quickly, comprehensively and in a way that can be defended.
PSRs are no longer a peripheral matter: they now form the foundation of prevention.
Therefore, the right question is not simply: “Do we have a policy?” but rather: “Can we show that we have a consistent, documented approach that is integrated into our prevention and participation measures and that is truly adapted to our operational reality?”
In many organizations, targeted support helps clarify applicable obligations, structure the framework (methodology, documentation, CSS/RSS roles), and prioritize tangible measures that are both practical on the ground and justifiable in the event of a dispute.
Would you like to better understand your obligations, structure your prevention measures or adapt your approach to your organization's reality?
Our labour and employment law professionals assist employers in clarifying the applicable obligations, structuring prevention procedures, and implementing measures tailored to their work environment and organizational challenges.
For matters relating to psychosocial risks, contact Fatme Saleh and Eve Tremblay for guidance tailored to your organization’s specific needs and operational realities.